message ack
basis.
Do you have active consumers for the destinations that are waiting for
space?
Can you reproduce this scenario?
2009/8/12 Chetan Sarva che...@milabra.com
Hi,
We appear to be facing a deadlock during queue message delivery. See
the following stack dump:
ActiveMQ Transport
Hi,
We appear to be facing a deadlock during queue message delivery. See
the following stack dump:
ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///10.10.10.30:40919 daemon prio=10
tid=0x2aab002a3800 nid=0x281e in Object.wait()
[0x57b77000]
java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (on object monitor)
Chetan Sarva-2 wrote:
3.0 now requires that you initialize the library before using it. Simply
call:
activemq::library::ActiveMQCPP::initializeLibrary();
and clean it up with:
activemq::library::ActiveMQCPP::shutdownLibrary();
no other code changes are required. You can simply
namespace I should go to for more features?
Any sample code will be helpful.
Best - Susmit
Chetan Sarva-2 wrote:
Which version of the library are you using? The latest version, 3.0,
which
was released less than 2 weeks ago, supports the failover transport for
handling scenarios like
Which version of the library are you using? The latest version, 3.0, which
was released less than 2 weeks ago, supports the failover transport for
handling scenarios like this.
chetan
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:22 PM, shaldar shaltr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all -
I wrote a publish/subscribe
After creating the queue or topic with createQueue(name) or
createTopic(name), you can specify the selector using createConsumer(name,
selector). Here's the method signature (from the 3.0 library):
virtual MessageConsumer* createConsumer(
const Destination* destination,
Hi,
Is Jencks still the preferred method of pooling connections for Spring's
JmsTemplate? The jencks.org site is dead and gone, and the codehaus site
seems a bit stale so it's hard to gauge if this is still being used and/or
maintained.
Also, it appears that Mule uses the
