Artemis examples: version of Camel becoming obsolete

2024-09-17 Thread Devriendt, Erik
The Camel example in the activemq-artemis-examples GIT repo still depends on Camel 3.16. However, Camel 3.x will become obsolete at the end of this year. The supported Camel version is now 4.8. Can someone update the example? Many thanks! Erik

RE: ActiveMQ Federation Questions

2024-09-17 Thread Devriendt, Erik
the bottom of the email. I > recall encountering a similar issue in ActiveMQ classic so I just > linked it there. > > Ken > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 2:16 AM Devriendt, Erik > wrote: > > > Hello Ken > > > > Your link points to the documentation of the Activ

RE: ActiveMQ Federation Questions

2024-09-17 Thread Devriendt, Erik
Hello Ken Your link points to the documentation of the ActiveMQ Classic version. Patrick indicates as version: AMQ: v2.36.0, which is the Artemis version. I think a better link is https://activemq.apache.org/components/artemis/documentation/latest/federation.html#federation Anyhow, several mont

Re: Artemis 2.35.0 - 2.37.0 restartEmbeddedWebserver() operation via web console causes jetty to fail

2024-08-30 Thread Devriendt, Erik
nd it looks like >> it started failing in 2.32.0 when we moved from Jetty 10.0.15 to 10.0.16. >> It appears that something changed in that version of Jetty to break the >> code in Artemis responsible for restarting it. >> >> >> Justin >> >> On Thu, A

Artemis 2.35.0 - 2.37.0 restartEmbeddedWebserver() operation via web console causes jetty to fail

2024-08-29 Thread Devriendt, Erik
Hello all I first noticed the problem described below with Artemis 2.35.0, but version 2.37.0 shows the same behavior: Calling the restartEmbeddedWebServer() operation via the web console does stop jetty and tries to restart it but jetty then generates a lot of exceptions, and the web console

Issue with TTL of received AMQP messages

2024-06-17 Thread Devriendt, Erik
We stumbled on an issue in Artemis with the handling of the TTL field of received AMQP. Our Artemis instance has a AMQP broker connection to a IBM MQ broker and receives messages forwarded by that IBM MQ broker. If the IBM client does not provide a specific TTL for a message, IBM MQ by default s

RE: MQTT retained messages and federation

2024-05-15 Thread Devriendt, Erik
Many thanks to those who replied to my question. -Original Message- From: Devriendt, Erik Sent: 8 May, 2024 11:56 To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: MQTT retained messages and federation Hello all I have a question about retained messages in MQTT. I have 2 federated activeMQ

MQTT retained messages and federation

2024-05-08 Thread Devriendt, Erik
Hello all I have a question about retained messages in MQTT. I have 2 federated activeMQ Artemis 2.32.0 brokers A and B. When I start a MQTT client on broker A that publishes a retained message on a given topic and then exits, a second MQTT subscriber client started later and connected to that

feasibility of connecting ActiveMQ Artemis with IBM MQ

2024-03-25 Thread Devriendt, Erik
Hello all We plan to use ActiveMQ Artemis in a larger project for our customer. This broker will serve the message exchange between the internal components of our system, but the customer also asks to connect to their IBM MQ broker for publishing data from the new system to other systems that ar

RE: Antwort: [Ext] Re: Is a federation of Hub-spoke broker topology possible with Artemis?

2024-02-08 Thread Devriendt, Erik
Herbert, you might try the hub and one of the spoke broker.xml that I posted in this topic. You should then publish and subscribe on topics with a name that starts with ‘cms’, if you don’t want to change the address-policy: Better then also remo

RE: Is a federation of Hub-spoke broker topology possible with Artemis?

2024-02-07 Thread Devriendt, Erik
BTW, as test producer and test consumer I used: artemis consumer --destination="topic://cms.test" artemis producer --destination="topic://cms.test"

RE: Is a federation of Hub-spoke broker topology possible with Artemis?

2024-02-07 Thread Devriendt, Erik
I guess that attachments won’t work, so I include them as plain text. BROKER A (a spoke) http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"; xsi:schemaLocation="urn:activemq /schema/artemis-configuration.xsd">

Is a federation of Hub-spoke broker topology possible with Artemis?

2024-02-07 Thread Devriendt, Erik
I tried to set up a small Hub-Spoke topology of 3 Artemis brokers. Each on a different machine, and expected to be able to configure address federation. I have 3 brokers: A, B and C. If I configure them in a full mesh topology, address federation works, that is, a consumer on any of the broker ma