Re: Variable volume of messages across consumers

2013-07-24 Thread Praveen Bysani
...@gmail.com wrote: Well, you have to make sure messages are getting bridged properly (take a close look at the bridge logging output) and are not bouncing back and forth for some reason. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Praveen Bysani praveen.ii...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, Thank

Re: Variable volume of messages across consumers

2013-07-22 Thread Praveen Bysani
, Christian Posta christian.po...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, that's what it means. On Sunday, July 14, 2013, Praveen Bysani wrote: Hi, I observed a lot of following messages in my log, 2013-07-15 03:48:22,399 | DEBUG | Message expired ActiveMQBytesMessage {commandId = 1498, responseRequired

Re: Variable volume of messages across consumers

2013-07-14 Thread Praveen Bysani
= false} ActiveMQBytesMessage{ bytesOut = null, dataOut = null, dataIn = null } | org.apache.activemq.broker.region.RegionBroker | ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///ip-address:40887@6122 Does that mean it failed to deliver the messages before the time to live ? On 12 July 2013 14:49, Praveen Bysani

Re: Variable volume of messages across consumers

2013-07-12 Thread Praveen Bysani
log4j.logger.org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridgeSupport=DEBUG On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Praveen Bysani praveen.ii...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I found the following lines in the subscriber log | org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor | DEBUG | 2013-07-11 07:34

Re: Variable volume of messages across consumers

2013-07-11 Thread Praveen Bysani
| org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor$2@61726a5c ms elapsed since last write check. I have disabled the inactivity period in the broker connection url by setting maxInactivityDuration to 0. Does it have anything to do with messages not being received ? On 11 July 2013 12:18, Praveen Bysani praveen.ii...@gmail.com

Variable volume of messages across consumers

2013-07-10 Thread Praveen Bysani
for a very long period. I suppose it is due to the prefetch size ? Since i am using a non persistent topic, the default value is quite high (according to activemq documentation), which again baffles me if that is really the reason. -- Regards, Praveen Bysani http://www.praveenbysani.com

Re: Reg: Restricting number of connections for a user

2012-10-11 Thread Praveen Bysani
a great example of this on pp132-133. From the Apache site, take a look at: http://activemq.apache.org/interceptors.html and http://activemq.apache.org/developing-plugins.html Christian On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Praveen Bysani praveen.ii...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am new user