https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7350

Hello All, Can someone pick up this issue? I am unable to reach out to the Jean-Baptiste Onofré or Christopher L. Shannon or Tim Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, Did you manage to have a look on the issue? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7350

Hello Tim, Can someone in your team pick up https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7350 Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, I have updated https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7350, so that you can reproduce the issue Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, Did you see my comments? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

png> All my camel routes associated to a single broker run in a single jvm. We do not have any non-brokers/applications which subscribe to the topics. All the subscriptions are only made by the backend broker queues. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveM

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim/JB, Also one more information. I tried to reproduce the issue with 1 frontend (with 1 topic) and 1 backend (with 1 camel route) and I was not able to reproduce it. I saw the issue after 7/8 backend brokers with a lot of routes. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, Your assumption is correct. And yes,*" reconnection logic the subscription name is being constructed incorrectly "* And yes : All my camel routes associated to a single broker run in a single jvm. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.co

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello JB, I have not set offlineDurableSubscriberTaskSchedule or offlineDurableSubscriberTimeout explicitly in my activemq.xml file. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, Sorry for the confusion. In my setup there are a lot of brokers which have a similar config. WRT to hello/world example that i refered, the config would look like broker-1 : broker-2: broker-3: ... Regards Ashish

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

ly one if active. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, I am setting the clientid in the file integration.camel.routes.xml, so that on each restart my durable susbcriber is always recognized and unique. Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans; class="org.apache.activemq.hooks.SpringContextHook" /> Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

I also created a ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-7350 -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Tim, I have tried to change mkahadb to standard kahadb as well in my dev environment. I still face the same issue. I will create a JIRA bug for the same. @JB would it be possible to share your config? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello JB, Do i need to create a Jira issue for the same or the issue created here is more than enough? Once you have a working config where you dont face the issue, please let me know Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello JB, Can you send me the config that you are using for persistence ? Have you enabled any parameters ? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello JB, Just a info, i am creating topics from config as well. Today, I tried the below Replaced by . in my mkahadb config. I will still not able to solve the issue Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello JB, Were you able to reproduce the issue? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

Hello Jean, I also noticed that even a simple restart of the broker, causes an inconsistent stage of offline durable subscriber. Did you managed to find anything? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

offline Durable Topic Subscribers issue in activemq 5.15.8

n though the config is correct. The broker treats the active subscriber as non-active. Has anyone faced the same issue ? Regards Ashish -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

ActiveMQ - 5.3.2 - connection taking too long to shutdown

*We are running ActiveMQ in JDBC master slave mode. A few days back we observed the following log entries in the master log files:* The connection to '/ip:port' is taking a long time to shutdown. | org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection | ActiveMQ Task . . . ERROR | Could not accept

JDBC Master/Slave - Workaround for the issue due to which master broker does not release lock

. Could this be used to plug-in a customized db locking code? -Ashish -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/JDBC-Master-Slave-Workaround-for-the-issue-due-to-which-master-broker-does-not-release-lock-tp3733813p3733813.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing

Point-to-Point Model - Multiple Consumers - ActiveMQ - 5.3.2

- NO MESSAGES RETRIEVED SECOND - CLOSED CONNECTION SECOND - NO MESSAGES RETRIEVED -Ashish -Ashish -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Point-to-Point-Model-Multiple-Consumers-ActiveMQ-5-3-2-tp3684188p3684188.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User

Re: Getting WARN: Local transaction had not been commited. Commiting now.

Any help on this issue? Thanks Ashish On Dec 12, 2007 3:26 PM, Ashish Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am using ACTIVE MQ 4.1.1. While running a MDB application with XA transaction I am getting the following warning message. 17:12:21,577 WARN [ServerSessionImpl:10] Local transaction

Getting WARN: Local transaction had not been commited. Commiting now.

any effect on the application. Please suggest why I am getting this warning message. Thanks and Regards Ashish