what top-level JARs does ActiveMQ 5.3.2 depend on?

Hi all: We manage our own JARs and wish to remove any that are not required. What's the easiest way to get a dependency listing of all JARs that ActiveMQ 5.3.2 depends on? Thanks in advance, Bob -- View this message in context:

Is it safe to extend ActiveMQObjectMessage to work-around the default object serialization?

Hi AMQ experts, I posted a question last week, but haven't had any replies yet [ http://old.nabble.com/URGENT-QUESTION:-AMQ-5.3.0-bug-or-configuration-error--ObjectMessage-is--still--being-serialized-when-using-setObjectMessageSerializationDefered-and-setCopyMessageOnSend-td27654579.html

URGENT QUESTION: AMQ 5.3.0 bug or configuration error??? - ObjectMessage is [still] being serialized when using setObjectMessageSerializationDefered and setCopyMessageOnSend

I'm sorry for the extremely URGENT nature of this question, but I believe I've either come across a bug in AMQ 5.3.0 or I need additional configuration settings. I have multiple POJO(s) that are using an embedded ActiveMQ broker via vm access. They are sending custom objects around as the

HOW TO: confirm copyMessageOnSend is working???

Hi all ActiveMQ gurus, BACKGROUND: I'm using AMQ 5.3 with the local vm:// transport and wish to make use of the copyMessageOnSend = FALSE convention to send my messages by reference [instead of by value]. Given the dynamic nature of our ObjectMessage-based messages and varying size of the

Re: HOW TO: confirm copyMessageOnSend is working???

16:49, bob.deremer bob.dere...@burningskysoftware.comwrote: Hi all ActiveMQ gurus, BACKGROUND: I'm using AMQ 5.3 with the local vm:// transport and wish to make use of the copyMessageOnSend = FALSE convention to send my messages by reference [instead of by value]. Given the dynamic

Is it possible to have 1 MessageListener POJO handle multiple queues?

Hi ActiveMQ experts, I have a scenario where I'd like to create a single MessageListener POJO, but it needs to be a listener on multiple queues. The reason is that I'm trying to support the following 2 cases: 1) a pub/sub event model using Virtual Topics. As a result, each subscriber (i.e.

Re: Is it possible to have 1 MessageListener POJO handle multiple queues?

and give each thread an instance of the POJO. What about spawning multiple threads, each having their own Session, instance of the message listener POJO, and pointed to a particular destination? Joe http://www.ttmsolutions.com bob.deremer wrote: Hi ActiveMQ experts, I have

Re: Is it possible to have 1 MessageListener POJO handle multiple queues?

my embedded Tomcat instance, I notice there are 20 QueueThread threads still??? How big is the default TaskRunner threadpool? Or, do I need to also set the optimizeDispatch property, too? If so, can someone tell me how to programmatically do this? Thanks again, Bob bob.deremer wrote: While

Problem trying to get ActiveMQ to load in Eclipse 3.5 launching local Tomcat 6 instance

Hi and Merry Christmas! I've been trying to get ActiveMQ to be loaded by the localhost instance of Tomcat6 when launched from Eclipse 3.5, but keep running into the following error: SEVERE: Exception processing Global JNDI Resources javax.naming.NamingException: Could not load resource factory