Hi, I have a question about filter destinantions.
I have de next configuration:
destinations
queue physicalName=transactionQueue-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT /
queue physicalName=logRecoveryQueue-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT /
queue
Hi, I'm with a doubt about how configure fine my system.
I'm tryng to start a master/slave broker and using
createTablesOnStartup=true in jdbcPersistenceAdapter I watched that this
create 3 tables
ACTIVEMQ_ACKS;
ACTIVEMQ_LOCK;
ACTIVEMQ_MSGS;
But too this create a register with ID 1 in the table
I did a few test and this work when I have a lot of message of Version2 and
Version1.
And the first test I send 5000 messages of each versions, and the consumer
starting process normal, and when process 500 messages stop, and start to
process again when all the messages was in the queue.
In other
Yes for the moment I'm using this
destinationInterceptors
virtualDestinationInterceptor
virtualDestinations
compositeQueue name=transactionQueue
forwardTo
No, this is OK. The problems is that when the consumer VERSION 2 is off and
the consumer VERSION 2 is on, and I send messages of the 2 VERSION the
messages of VERSION 1 stay in the queue and are not consumed by the consumer
or sometimes are consumed a little part and the other stay in the queue.
Sorry, I know that my English is not good.
Consumer with selector Version=1 - ON
Consumer with selector Version 2 - OFF
I sent message of Version 1, and Version 2.
The messages of Version 2 are storage in the queue this is OK, because the
consumer is OFF.
The messages of Version 1, some are
I'm using version 5.10.0
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Message-Selector-or-Composite-Destinations-tp4687564p4687673.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I'm in a trouble in my system. I have a lot of clients that send message
with differente VERSION and I have one consumer per version that recibe this
message, I'm using message selector on a only queue to do that, but I found
a problem when I sent for exmple message of 2 versions and I had
This is by default? Can I change that?
What's the best architecture for a system that need send message to a remote
broker all the time and if the remote broker is offline, need to save this
message in a local queue and send when the connection is established again ?
--
View this message in
Perfect! This works that I expected.
Thanks.
Juan Manuel
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-embedded-broker-tp4687370p4687404.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi, I'm having a problem in my system.
In my producer, I have the next configuration.
bean id=kahaDBPersistenceAdapter
class=org.apache.activemq.store.kahadb.KahaDBPersistenceAdapter
property name=checksumJournalFiles value=true /
Thanks for the reply,
I have a doubt, I in my client define a broker that have a netwotk connector
to my activeMQServer (is a name).
In my activeMQServer, Would I need define a broker that listen this message?
I could define a broker to listen and then then other that have netwotk
connector to
Hi, I'm new with ActiveMQ. I'm starting to use for resolve a problem in my
system. I have 1000 clients that send message to different servers. For
resolve that I thougth in an architecture with the next.
- In the clients configure a Broker with network connector to a master/slave
broker.
- In the
13 matches
Mail list logo