within a
transaction will be sent async by default and the commit will be a
sync call.
On 10 February 2012 10:07, kaustubh khasnis kaustubh.khas...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
While producing the messages, is it possible to use something similar to
CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGEMENT so that we can
://www.synechron.com
SYNECHRON -
- Top 15 Best IT Employers for 5 consecutive years (link).
- Celebrating 10 Years!
-Original Message-
From: kaustubh khasnis [mailto:kaustubh.khas...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 12:20 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Specifying
Hi,
is there any way we can specify a timeout on producer for send call??
Thanks and regards
Kaustubh
the intent of each
component.
Why do you want to override the messageId?
On 23 September 2011 14:19, kaustubh khasnis kaustubh.khas...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please correct me if I am wrong, but in same onSend method one could
override the messageId as well right?
We also planning to use
Please correct me if I am wrong, but in same onSend method one could
override the messageId as well right?
We also planning to use same, are there any ill-effects of that?
Thanks and regards
Kaustubh
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Martin C. mart...@gmx.at wrote:
Hi,
ok I see, but this is
Hi Gary,
We also have observed this problem, when the backlog piles up (e.g. for some
reason consumers are disconnected, like network outage) producers as well
slows down, even when producer flow control is disabled, send is
asynchronous.
Thanks and regards
Kaustubh
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:18
Hi,
We can set the expiry of messages when sending the message from producer.
But is there any way we can set the message expiry per destination inside
the broker??
Thanks and regards
Kaustubh
August 2011 09:51, kaustubh khasnis kaustubh.khas...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
We can set the expiry of messages when sending the message from producer.
But is there any way we can set the message expiry per destination inside
the broker??
Thanks and regards
Kaustubh
--
http
, kaustubh khasnis kaustubh.khas...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I was running a performance test in which I tried to add a backlog of
around
4-5 M messages over 10 virtual topic,pushed by around 100 producers and
then
tried to drain them by equal number of consumers , with 10 consumers
forming
Hi,
I was running a performance test in which I tried to add a backlog of around
4-5 M messages over 10 virtual topic,pushed by around 100 producers and then
tried to drain them by equal number of consumers , with 10 consumers forming
a group of virtual topic consumer. in middle of draining I
Hi,
Can anyone please help me with this??
--Kaustubh
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:56 AM, kaustubh khasnis kaustubh.khas...@gmail.com
wrote:
forgot to mention, the numbers are in nanoseconds
--Kaustubh
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:40 AM, kaustubh khasnis
kaustubh.khas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Hi,
I have created an embedded broker and having 10 producers pushing messages
over 1 topic and 10 consumer consuming it. while shutting down the broker I
get following warning:
The connection to 'ip address:port' is taking a long time to shutdown.
and the broker is stuck(it doesn't shut down).
if I am wrong.
--Kaustubh
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Gary Tully gary.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
take a thread dump of the broker and have a peek at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3435, that fix may be what
you need.
On 4 August 2011 07:53, kaustubh khasnis kaustubh.khas
are terminated very quickly and uncleanly. Your
thread dump may indicate a different problem, as in there may be some
message send in progress or a dispatch... it depends very much on
configuration.
Post a thread dump of your scenario if you reproduce it.
On 4 August 2011 13:06, kaustubh khasnis
Hi,
I have disabled flow control at the broker end. also I am sending messages
asynchronously, while the delivery mode is persistent. but still I am seeing
many spikes at the producer end in time required for send call.
Can anyone please help me with why this might be happening and what I might
be
forgot to mention, the numbers are in nanoseconds
--Kaustubh
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:40 AM, kaustubh khasnis kaustubh.khas...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I have disabled flow control at the broker end. also I am sending messages
asynchronously, while the delivery mode is persistent. but still I
Years!
-Original Message-
From: kaustubh khasnis [mailto:kaustubh.khas...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 7:57 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Message consumed count at broker end per unit time
HI,
Is there any way in activemq with which we can get count number
Hi,
Is there any way in activeMQ to disable the message cursor for non-durable
subscribers. My use case is like: the messages should always be persistent
and will have both durable and non-durable subscribers to it. In case
durable subscriber is faster than non-durable subscriber , MQ will still
Hi,
Thanks for the reply, I instead chose to write a broker plugin which will
keep on calculating the stats and send to a central server. The counters I
am increamenting in send method and postProcessDispatch method. somehow It
looks like messageconsumed and messagedelivered methods are not being
HI,
Is there any way in activemq with which we can get count number of messages
consumed/produced *per second/minute at the broker end*?? I know we can get
the queue size in the broker at a given instance , but I need to know the
aggregate count for a unit time.
Thanks and regards
Kaustubh
20 matches
Mail list logo