Re: Upgrade from 5.9. to 5.10

Hi I'm a bit puzzled, that I don't get any replies. Is this because - it's a stupid question - nobody experienced this before - nobody knows the answer Surely I'm not the only one who ever did an upgrade in a productive system and had to preserve the state of the queues. Thanks for your time.

Re: Request / Reply in Network of Brokers

We have Network TTL=10 and decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority not set (so it defaults to false) So I'm going to try with decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority = true. Thanks for your help. Regards Laci On 08.05.2014 05:17, artnaseef [via ActiveMQ] wrote: Is this with the default Network TTL setting of

Re: Request / Reply in Network of Brokers

Setting decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority = true solved the problem. Thanks again. Regards Laci On 08.05.2014 07:42, Laci Gaspar wrote: We have Network TTL=10 and decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority not set (so it defaults to false) So I'm going to try with decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority = true.

Request / Reply in Network of Brokers

Hi We have a network of brokers something like this: A ---B---CMesh We are producing some Messages with Request / Reply Pattern in A and those Messages are supposed to be consumed also in A. Now sometimes only half the Messages are being consumed in A and the rest is lost somewhere.

Re: Loads of TIME_WAIT connections

You are right, the problem is caused by the client. The expiry timeout for the PooledConnectionFactory was set to 1ms by default, so every connection was going to TIME_WAIT state after 1ms if not used. I have increased this numer and now I have a nice low number of TIME_WAIT connections. thanks

Loads of TIME_WAIT connections

Sorry if this has been asked before, I have seen several posts, but none of them helped. I'm running AMQ 5.8 on linux 64bit. Camel routes generated by Talend ESB. As a test I have one pooled connection factory (default values) and one jms consumer. The jms consumer is configured with