Re: Question about listeners performance

2013-04-30 Thread mvilleta
Does anyone have any suggestions for my problem? I'm sure I'm doing something wrong in my example, because I can't believe that the activemq standard configuration and this example (too simple) couldn't be sustainable in time. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4

Re: Question about listeners performance

2013-04-28 Thread mvilleta
I attach new screenshots from the same execution, after more than 2 hours. Everything it's worst: graphic.png allObject.jpg recordedObject.png

Re: Question about listeners performance

2013-04-28 Thread mvilleta
Hi, I repeated the test again for attach snapshots with the living objects during the execution. After run the example for 1 hour and I got again the following performance graphic: performance_graphic.jpg JProfiler t

Re: Question about listeners performance

2013-04-27 Thread mvilleta
Ok, so I'm still confusing with the results of my example. Independently the moment which GC will appear, it should be released all the non-used resources, including the resources of other GC generations. In my example, the rate of messages consumed are enough, so all of them will be consumed. For

Re: Question about listeners performance

2013-04-27 Thread mvilleta
Both consumer and producer was executed from a main class that create two instances of them (one per each). Then, I made a runnable jar file and I run it from the JProfiler tool. I had understood (reading the documentation) that non-persistence messages are never allocated on the disk. Simply they

Question about listeners performance

2013-04-26 Thread mvilleta
Good Afternoon, Thanks for all the sugestions. I applied the prefetchedSize property and I set it to 1 (it's because I'm not interesting in prefetch any message). I continue with the same problem. For simplify my case, I developed an small example, and I took different snapshots that I attached to

Question about listeners performance

2013-04-22 Thread mvilleta
Thanks for your answers, I continue having the same problem. Reading the API specifications of "close" method for MessageConsumer and MessageProducer, I noticed that it specifies the following: "Since a provider may allocate some resources on behalf of a MessageProducer outside the JVM, clients s

Re: Question about listeners performance

2013-04-19 Thread mvilleta
Good morning, I'm using the following configurations: - I'm running my application in a VMWare Virtual Machine: Single CPU, 2GB RAM, 20GB of local disk. SO: Win7 (32bits) - Java SE 1.6.35 with standar configuration - ActiveMQ 5.5.1 without any tunning modification. Specifically, i'm using produce

Question about listeners performance

2013-04-18 Thread mvilleta
Good Afternoon, I'm a new user of JMS technology and particularly with ActiveMQ solution. I'm having some problems with the performance of my application. Specifically, i'm developing a 24x7 application. We are using MessageListener for all consumers. Doing performance and continuity tests I dete