Yes, after 2 days of testing, the messages are not getting stuck in a pending
state.
So, this means that, creating and destroying the ActiveMQConnectionFactory
repeatedly is
creating some problems. So, this should be either documented or fixed so
that
users won't get caught in a situation where
I also thought so, but creating the ConnectionFactory repeatedly has caused
the issues for me.
It is very easy to reproduce. Just put the creation of ConnectionFactory in
a loop and send
messages from the connections obtained. You will be able to reproduce if my
observation is correct with
I think I know the problem for the pending messages. I will confirm in 2 days
since I need to more time to test before I can exactly tell that this was
the problem.
Somebody else should test this, and try to reproduce it.
Here is the scenario.
I have 2 types of jms clients. One client resides
Hi all,
I have read several of the threads where people experienced messages stuck
in pending state in queues.
I see that ActiveMQ from version 5.1 onward has this issue. Has this ever
been fixed?
I am also experiencing the same now. The incoming message flow rate is very
minimal. I have
I am using 5.8.0 now.
pramod
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-stuck-in-pending-state-in-queue-tp4669239p4669245.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Is there anybody using ActiveMQ 5.8 and does not have pending messages
problem?
If there is, then it is the way ActiveMQ is configured. So, please send me
the info.
Otherwise it is a bug.
Thanks
Pramod
--
View this message in context:
Mohit,
Thanks for helping me!
Here are the params I set after going through several forum threads where
their messages were stuck.
Pramod
---
beans
xmlns=http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans;
xmlns:amq=http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core;
Yes, consumers are alive when the messages are stuck !
Thanks
Pramod
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-stuck-in-pending-state-in-queue-tp4669239p4669249.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Presently I am not using Master/Slave, but we do intend to use it soon. So, I
will try the lease locker and see what happens. Thanks for the response.
Pramod
--
View this message in context:
Thanks for the recommendation !
pramod
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Activemq-5-8-problem-with-Oracle-jdbc-adapter-tp4669080p4669135.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Chirag,
On my linux VM, only one activemq instance starts up when I did similar
things that you mentioned.
The other process does not start and there is no error in data directory and
there is a .pid file created
in data directory.
Did you have that problem? I am using oracle jdbc for
I did that. Thanks for that.
But I get the exception
Error: Exception thrown by the agent : java.rmi.server.ExportException: Port
already in use: 1099; nested exception is:
java.net.BindException: Address already in use
I looked for the port 1099 in activemq.xml file but it is not
We are 2 different people from different companies.
I am trying to setup master/slave mode using oracle jdbc, and Chirag helped
me
identify the config issues. However, I am still seeing the exception
Error: Exception thrown by the agent : java.rmi.server.ExportException: Port
already in use:
I am using ActiveMQ 5.8 with Oracle as persistent store.
I keep getting the following exception saying that it could not get the DB
lock.
Has anybody faced this issue? Does it have to do with configuration
settings?
I have pasted the exception below.
Thanks
Pramod
2013-07-09
Hi gtully,
Somebody had posted a solution to this problem which sets the following
configuration for jdbc adapter.
Is this a good solution to prevent the DB lock issue? What does it actually
do?
jdbcPersistenceAdapter ...
databaseLocker
database-locker queryTimeout=-1 /
Mandar,
I am facing the same issue.
Did you have a solution for this?
Please post the solution if you had.
Thanks
Pramod
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Failed-to-update-lease-Oracle-connection-Reset-tp4662859p4668380.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
Hi all,
I need to cluster 2 brokers on the same machine by having them use 2
different ports.
Is there documentation on how to do this in master/slave mode? I need only 1
server
to be active all the time and if that goes down, the other broker should
take over.
Also, is there a way to
Thanks for your reply.
Unfortunately I don't have the luxury of starting on another machine.
But, it is ok if only master is up and slave comes up when master dies.
So, do you know how to set this configuration up?
Thanks
Pramod
--
View this message in context:
18 matches
Mail list logo