problem about forwarding bridge from VM to remote host

There is an embedded broker inside application, application sends messages to this vm ,and vm forwards messages to remote broker A. there is a consumer receiving messages on remote broker A using asyn mode. the configure uri like this - "vm:(broker:(network:static:(tcp://remotehostA:61616))?persis

question about static network connector?

Now, I have a JDBC master/slave cluster: tcp://remote1:61616, tcp://remote2:61616, tcp:/remote3:61616 I start a VM , application write message to VM, then VM forward messages to this master/slave cluster. core code is below: ActiveMQConnectionFactory factory = new ActiveMQConne

Can I improve throughput by adding connection number to Activemq provider?

suppose that application A send message to ActiveMQ B which has a queue named "testqueue". Can this method improve thoughtput ? application A create more than one connections to provider, then A send messages to the same queue (such "testqueue") using all these connections. Can this method works

Re: when Consumer consume a message using method receive(), why the mesage does not dequeue from activeMQ?

I used "session = connection.createSession(false,2);" to create a session. when I changto "session = connection.createSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);" Consumer can successfully dequeue message from MQ. It works!!! but which scenario "create.Session(false, 2)" can use? when and wh

when Consumer consume a message using method receive(), why the mesage does not dequeue from activeMQ?

I'm a beginner with activemq, now I try to use method receive() in class MessageConsumer. yes , it can get messages successfully. but when I browse this queue, these messages still in it？ How can I receive a message ,at same time delete this message from queue ? since when I restart consumer , I