Re: Firewall, is TCP 61616 sufficient?

2009-11-19 Thread wytten
This problem eventually went away by setting pubSubDomain to true in the Spring JMS Template config, but why this behaved differently in the presence of a firewall remains a mystery. wytten wrote: > > still haven't resolved this issue--I can communicate with a broker on my > n

Re: Firewall, is TCP 61616 sufficient?

2009-10-22 Thread wytten
wytten wrote: > > Is there some other port which needs to be opened in addition to TCP > 61616? I'm talking about the simplest case of using a single broker > configuration. > I still haven't resolved this issue--I can communicate with a broker on my network but

Firewall, is TCP 61616 sufficient?

2009-10-12 Thread wytten
I've got a very simple Java/Spring program that works with an out-of-the-box ActiveMQ 5.2.0 configuration when the broker is local. When I send a message to the broker, I can see with the admin interface that the queue was created and the message was received. However, this same client program a