thx much.
ragards
yolcuabbas
rajdavies wrote:
>
> failover depends on the InactivityMonitor - but also socket death too
> - which might take a while to percolate through.
>
> cheers,
>
> Rob
> On 19 Feb 2008, at 07:27, yolcuabbas wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi
Hi,
thanks for prompt reply. We can not upgrade easyl, because we use amq 4.1.1
in production :( is it true, that failover protocol depends on
InactivityMonitor?
regards,
fatih
rajdavies wrote:
>
>
>
> yolcuabbas wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we use activ
Hi,
we use activemq 4.1.1 and have following problem. the uri is
failover://(tcp://:xxx?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0).
If I put the value of maxInactivityDuration to 0 and try to stop the
connection over jconsole, my client dont try to reconnect to broker. is the
failover protocol depe
Hi,
if you create a JMS Message with CorrellationID ( byte [] x = new byte
[]{0,0,0} ), then you receive such exceptions. I dont know whether it is a
bug or a feature ...
Hasnain Muhammad Iqbal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am running IBM Performance Harness with ActiveMQ 4.1.1 and it is giving
> me
i have checked the status of subscribers. all consumers have active state!
what is downside of queuePrefetch of 0?
yolcuabbas
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> yes. with prefetch of 1 the first message stays always o
thx for help. another question... what means actually queuePrefetch of 0?
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> yes. with prefetch of 1 the first message stays always on queue after
>> startup! blocked consumer? how ca
yes. with prefetch of 1 the first message stays always on queue after
startup! blocked consumer? how can i see blocked consumers with JMX?
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/14/07, yolcuabbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i have observed stran
Hi,
i have observed strange behaviour. I use activemq4.1 with mule1.3.3. the
first message stays always on queue!!! if i change the value of
queuePrefetch to zero then it will be consumed. is it expected behaviour?
thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/queu
