Re: AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY and transactional boundaries

2013-02-26 Thread johnsimons
Hi Tim, Just to clarify. The issue is not that the "callback/delayed" message is not part of the transaction. The issue is that the actual enqueuing of the message with AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY is not part of the ambient transaction. Hope this clarifies our problem. Regards John -- View this messa

Re: AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY and transactional boundaries

2012-10-29 Thread Timothy Bish
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 17:41 -0700, arkin wrote: > I have observed that when sending delayed delivery messages (with > AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY values in the header), ActiveMQ does not seem to be > including the delivery in the original transaction. This results in > duplicate messages being delivered i

AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY and transactional boundaries

2012-10-26 Thread arkin
I have observed that when sending delayed delivery messages (with AMQ_SCHEDULED_DELAY values in the header), ActiveMQ does not seem to be including the delivery in the original transaction. This results in duplicate messages being delivered in my setup. Here is how I tested: 1. Send a message to a