tic queues, will all the leaks in the broker be
solved?
If i create a new connection for each request process, should this
solve the
problem?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-version-5.X---java-5---memory-leaks-tp16122693s2354p16122693.html
Sent from th
---memory-leaks-tp16122693s2354p16122693.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-version-5.X---java-5---memory-leaks-tp16122693s2354p16124205.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at
se problems, when will there be
>> fixes for
>> these problems?
>>
>> If i will use a static queues, will all the leaks in the broker be
>> solved?
>>
>> If i create a new connection for each request process, should this
>> solve the
>&
process, should this
solve the
problem?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-version-5.X---java-5---memory-leaks-tp16122693s2354p16122693.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
fixes for
these problems?
If i will use a static queues, will all the leaks in the broker be solved?
If i create a new connection for each request process, should this solve the
problem?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-version-5.X---java-5---memory-leaks