Thank you Tim . Using NFSV4 and not sure about the testing of NFS file lock
with out activemq ? It worked before and all of a sudden when i launch ,
both of them are going to slave modes. i have created a new EFS mounts and
tried still its going under slave. Have restarted each one of the broker on
Are you using NFSv4?
Can you test whether you can acquire an NFS file lock in that location
without using ActiveMQ? Take ActiveMQ out of the mix and make sure your
underlying infrastructure works.
Tim
On Mar 30, 2017 11:29 AM, "akhil" wrote:
> Hi Gary ,
>
> I have a same setup as bala. Two bro
Hi Gary ,
I have a same setup as bala. Two brokers with common shared file storage but
when the brokers are getting started up both are on slave modes. The shared
file storage is not being used by any other broker. We created a new mount
and tested with that , but still the two brokers are on sla
are the two brokers running under the same user id?
On 13 May 2013 22:49, bala_82 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using activemq 5.7 running on Linux with JDK 1.6 for setting up a
> shared file system master slave broker.
>
> There are two activemq nodes which access a NFSV4 shared file system for
> storag
Hi,
I am using activemq 5.7 running on Linux with JDK 1.6 for setting up a
shared file system master slave broker.
There are two activemq nodes which access a NFSV4 shared file system for
storage.
Initially , i can start one of the nodes as the master and it gets the
Kahadb lock. After this, i
