Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2013-07-19 Thread slam
ion.commit(LocalTransaction.java:72) ... 13 more -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Master-slave-with-MySQLCluster-backend-tp4341454p4669520.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2013-07-19 Thread Christian Hilgers
Am 19.07.2013 00:49, schrieb slam: Hi Christian, In your multi master MySql setup, did you replicate the data? If not, will you lose messages if one of the MySql servers that contains messages failed/shut down? assuming you did refer to me. I do not run MySQL replication, like Master-Master

Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2013-07-18 Thread Christian Posta
: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Master-slave-with-MySQLCluster-backend-tp4341454p4669488.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- *Christian Posta* http://www.christianposta.com/blog twitter: @christianposta

Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2013-07-18 Thread slam
Hi Christian, In your multi master MySql setup, did you replicate the data? If not, will you lose messages if one of the MySql servers that contains messages failed/shut down? -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Master-slave-with-MySQLCluster

Re:Re: Re:Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2013-03-28 Thread SuoNayi
slave after an exception (db failure), the vip is >sending >> traffic to the dead MQ as 61616 is still active! >> >> Good god! Its a nightmare. Can someone help? Has 5.8 resolved this issue? >I >> hope? Please someone advise. >> >> >> thanks >> Ali. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Master-slave-with-MySQLCluster-backend-tp4341454p4665253.html >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Re:Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2013-03-28 Thread Paul Gale
node fails to cleanly close > 61616/or become a slave after an exception (db failure), the vip is sending > traffic to the dead MQ as 61616 is still active! > > Good god! Its a nightmare. Can someone help? Has 5.8 resolved this issue? I > hope? Please someone advise. > > >

Re: Re:Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2013-03-28 Thread schweet
db failure), the vip is sending traffic to the dead MQ as 61616 is still active! Good god! Its a nightmare. Can someone help? Has 5.8 resolved this issue? I hope? Please someone advise. thanks Ali. -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Master-

Re:Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2013-03-27 Thread SuoNayi
; > > > > > > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Master-slave-with-MySQLCluster-backend-tp4341454p4665178.html >Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2013-03-27 Thread schweet
: -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Master-slave-with-MySQLCluster-backend-tp4341454p4665178.html Sent from the

Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2012-02-13 Thread Gary Tully
That seems very reasonable. The locker implementation can specified via configuration, it would be great if you could provide an implementation that you can verify with your setup. note the interface: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/store/

Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2012-02-13 Thread Christian Hilgers
Am 01.02.2012 17:57, schrieb Christian Hilgers: Any Updates/comments here? Am 31.01.2012 14:13, schrieb Gary Tully: This need some work. On 5.6, a single broker can deal with a failover of the jdbc store. The difficulty is locking in the master/slave case, or peer cluster case. The current lo

Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2012-02-01 Thread Christian Hilgers
Am 31.01.2012 14:13, schrieb Gary Tully: This need some work. On 5.6, a single broker can deal with a failover of the jdbc store. The difficulty is locking in the master/slave case, or peer cluster case. The current lock impl (who's job it is to get an exclusive lock on the store) treats failure

Reply:Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2012-01-31 Thread SuoNayi
I had set up two brokers based on master-slave mode. What I'm suffering are the two problems: 1, NDB store engine of Mysql cluster does not support distributed lock so brokers based on master-slave mode fails to get the exclusive lock and finally two masters are bringing up. 2, With the store

Re: ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2012-01-31 Thread Gary Tully
This need some work. On 5.6, a single broker can deal with a failover of the jdbc store. The difficulty is locking in the master/slave case, or peer cluster case. The current lock impl (who's job it is to get an exclusive lock on the store) treats failure of a lock as a fatal event and stops the b

ActiveMQ Master/slave with MySQLCluster backend

2012-01-30 Thread Christian Hilgers
Hi, I am trying to setup a redundant ActiveMQ environment using * ActiveMQ 5.5.1 * MySQL Cluster 5.1.47-ndb-7.1.5-cluster-gpl * on Solaris 10 zones * Java: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_27-b07) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 20.2-b06, mixed mode) * An application deployed i