ee
>> http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html).
>> Now I'm trying to figure out whether Network-of-Brokers is a common
>> pattern;
>> and on which scale it is actually used with other applications out there.
>>
>> Can you please boast about your Net
your Network-of-ActiveMQ-brokers?
For me, a rough indication about the tolopogy (star, mesh, line, etc) and
the number of brokers will do.
thx!
Erwin
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
there.
Can you please boast about your Network-of-ActiveMQ-brokers?
For me, a rough indication about the tolopogy (star, mesh, line, etc) and
the number of brokers will do.
thx!
Erwin
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
tHook"/>
/
Thanks you in advance!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-network-of-brokers-messages-are-not-balanced-tp4718074.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
esday, September 29, 2015 12:55 AM
> To: ActiveMQ Users
> Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Network of Brokers plus HA for messages [ EXTERNAL ]
> Importance: High
>
> They're mutually exclusive within a specific cluster of nodes, but you can
> compose a network of brokers out of multiple master/sla
ptember 29, 2015 12:55 AM
To: ActiveMQ Users
Subject: Re: ActiveMQ Network of Brokers plus HA for messages [ EXTERNAL ]
Importance: High
They're mutually exclusive within a specific cluster of nodes, but you can
compose a network of brokers out of multiple master/slave cluster.
So (to pick a rand
oth?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-plus-HA-for-messages-tp4702395.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-plus-HA-for-messages-tp4702395.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Il 29/12/2013 23:50, Bilgin Ibryam ha scritto:
Hi Enrico,
in case you haven't seen it yet, this old video has very useful tips for
performance and capability:
Performance tuning for ActiveMQ by Rob Davies.
http://download.progress.com/5331/open/adobe/prc/psc/perf_tuning_activemq/index.htm
Yeah, it's valuable insight.
Make sure you save it locally because AFAIK Progress Software no longer
holds any commercial interest in AMQ; therefore they may take down the
presentation anytime. It's just fortuitous that it's still publicly
available – if you ask me.
Regards,
Raúl.
On Mon, Dec
Hi
Is it possible to save it locally? Have you managed to do this?
Best regards
Krzysztof
On 30.12.2013 13:50, Raul Kripalani wrote:
Yeah, it's valuable insight.
Make sure you save it locally because AFAIK Progress Software no longer
holds any commercial interest in AMQ; therefore they may
It's a Flash animation/video. There are various methods to save those, I
believe.
I suppose this is okay as long as you exercise strictly private and
personal use only.
Regards,
Raúl.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak
krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Is it possible to
You are not limited to tcp for your network of brokers configurations.
You can use any of the defined protocols that are implemented by ActiveMQ.
Take a look at the following link
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
It describes how to setup a network of brokers for Activemq
this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-network-of-brokers-don-t-forward-messages-back-tp4664973.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
brokers. I have tried to set networkTTL=4 and
duplex=true on the broker network connector, but it doesn't work.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-network-of-brokers-don-t-forward-messages-back-tp4664973.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list
have tried to set networkTTL=4 and
duplex=true on the broker network connector, but it doesn't work.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-network-of-brokers-don-t-forward-messages-back-tp4664973.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive
Im trying to understand the concept behind the network of brokers in
ActiveMQ. What I understand from the documentation is that by having a
network or broker we can get load balancing. I would assume that load
balancing would mean that the messages are sent to either one of the brokers
(Master
That's not a network of brokers, it's a single broker with a failover. For
a network of brokers you would need multiple databases.
(*Chris*)
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:28 AM, joesan codeintheo...@gmail.com wrote:
Im trying to understand the concept behind the network of brokers in
ActiveMQ
But isn't configuring the networkConnectors with a static discovery in the
activemq.xml configuration file is a network of brokers?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435p4655439.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing
:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435p4655439.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/broker/5.5/clustering/FuseMBClusterFaultTolerenceNetwork.html
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435p4655442.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks for the reply. Can you explain me why that with a shared file system I
cannot have a network of brokers?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435p4655444.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive
.
Like you now mention that I have to have two shared database and two nodes
of Master / Slave, I can acheive NOB. The point is clarified.
Thanks for helping me out!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network-of-Brokers-tp4655435p4655446.html
Sent from
connectors and will wait for the lock.
Like you now mention that I have to have two shared database and two nodes
of Master / Slave, I can acheive NOB. The point is clarified.
Thanks for helping me out!
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Network
Hi,
I found an old message on this mailing list stating:
I don't want to load balance across brokers; I want sticky load
balancing
across consumers, with failover. I have a network-of-brokers. The
message
groups documentation (http://activemq.apache.org/message-groups.html)
says I
can use that
static
configuration of network of brokers?
Please suggest
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/activemq-network-of-brokers-tp28552663p28552663.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration
to use static configutaion here
But what would be the ip address to be used . Can I create a multicast
address for both these set of brokers and use that in my static
configuration of network of brokers?
Please suggest
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/activemq-network
static
configuration of network of brokers?
Please suggest
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/activemq-network-of-brokers-tp28552663p28552663.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http
of brokers and use that in my static
configuration of network of brokers?
Please suggest
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/activemq-network-of-brokers-tp28552663p28552663.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
29 matches
Mail list logo
