ore delays) and we had received the
> ResourceAllocationException.
>
> I don't know exactly why this happens. Could this be a bug?
>
> Thanks
> L.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-ResourceAllocationExcepti
is message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-ResourceAllocationException-is-delayed-tp4669871p4671400.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
th the memoryLimit configured
> for
> the queue or is this just a coincidence? And if so why are they not updated
> with every incoming message or at a faster pace?
>
> L.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Ac
t updated
with every incoming message or at a faster pace?
L.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-ResourceAllocationException-is-delayed-tp4669871p4669912.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
the systems are configured.
I will dig deeper and post my findings.
Thanks.
L.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-ResourceAllocationException-is-delayed-tp4669871p4669905.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
e is a delay with which
> AMQ sends the ResourceAllocationException, 10 seconds after the memoryLimit
> for the queue is reached.
>
> Why is this happening? Have I done something wrong or am I missing
> something? Why is this apparent 10 seconds delay and how can I turn this
> off?
ext:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-ResourceAllocationException-is-delayed-tp4669871.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
