We are in dilemma in which persistence option to use for activeMQ. we tested both local disk and NFs version 4 . The NFSv4 was very slow when compared to the speed of local disk. But we will be more comfortable with a master-slave topology.
Can any one suggest what else can we think so ? Can lustre be a better option ? Thanks, Radha -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-persistence-store-option-tp29182264p29182264.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
