Re: ActiveMQ web console better than Artemis?

Thank you so much. It makes sense. This is what I was looking for :) -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: ActiveMQ web console better than Artemis?

I think there may be a bit of confusion about the presentation of the information between the two consoles. The ActiveMQ 5.x console presents information mainly in JMS terms (e.g. queues, topics, durable subscribers, non-durable subscribers, etc.). However, Artemis was written from the ground up to

Re: ActiveMQ web console better than Artemis?

What Clebert is saying is something along the lines of "If you have concrete, specific improvements you'd like to see for the web console, please submit them as JIRA enhancement requests, preferably with an associated pull request that fixes them." Also, keep in mind that UX preferences can be (no

Re: ActiveMQ web console better than Artemis?

I meant something like this -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: ActiveMQ web console better than Artemis?

I thought artemis is pretty good. We accept pull requests thought ;) On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 8:15 PM artemisn00b wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering why activemq's web console is much better, compared to > artemis. Is there a reason to it? > In ActiveMQ, you can view all the Active Durable Topic

ActiveMQ web console better than Artemis?

Hi, I was wondering why activemq's web console is much better, compared to artemis. Is there a reason to it? In ActiveMQ, you can view all the Active Durable Topic Subscribers, Offline Durable Topic Subscribers, Active Non-Durable Topic Subscribers, Topics/Queues on separate tabs. I know all of it