Thanks for your suggestion and the comment regarding send-to-dla-on-no-route.
I will probably use your approach. However, I did try to do a little adjustment
by defining the DLQ address like this (since that appears to be similar to how
auto-create-dead-letter-resources creates queues when set
is not recommended since dropping messages that have
no route is standard practice for multicast (i.e. pub/sub) use-cases.
Hope that helps.
Justin
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 3:42 PM Calle Andersson
wrote:
> I have an old A-MQ with a lot of composite queues, e.g:
>
> queue="TEST.QU
@activemq.apache.org
Ämne: Replacing composite queues with Artemis
I have an old A-MQ with a lot of composite queues, e.g:
Currently, I'm investigating how to migrate to Artemis. The implementations of
the existing clients (which sends and receives messages) should not be adjusted
(i.e. the names
I have an old A-MQ with a lot of composite queues, e.g:
Currently, I'm investigating how to migrate to Artemis. The implementations of
the existing clients (which sends and receives messages) should not be adjusted
(i.e. the names of the queues should be the same and the clients should
one broker A on Azure cloud and another broker B one
> hosted
> on my company premises. So in this will network connector, allow forward to
> from A to B?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/ActiveMq-composite-queues-tp47288
://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMq-composite-queues-tp4728865p4729628.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
of a little disk I/O.
Tim
On Jul 25, 2017 7:49 AM, "mansi" <mansitiwar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Do composite queues allow to forwardTo to another ActiveMQ broker
> instances?
> Or it just allow to forwardTo queues in the same Broker instance.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
Do composite queues allow to forwardTo to another ActiveMQ broker instances?
Or it just allow to forwardTo queues in the same Broker instance.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMq-composite-queues-tp4728865.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing
Hi there,
what is the there a difference (is there any?) between
compositeQueue name=A
forwardTo
queue physicalName=B1 /
queue physicalName=B2 /
/forwardTo
/compositeQueue
and
compositeQueue name=B1
that with a unit test / load driver in a
local environment
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-lost-by-connecting-composite-queues-tp4681990.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Composite-Queues-tp4024148p4024148.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/virtualDestinations
/virtualDestinationInterceptor
/destinationInterceptors
It is in activemq possible to define more than as one compositeQueues? I use
the activemq version 5.5.0
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Composite-Queues-tp4024148p4024148.html
Sent
? How does message forwarding from Q.IN to other queues
relate to producer transaction, i.e. does it happen in the same transaction?
Thanks,
Ozan
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Possibility-of-message-loss-in-composite-queues-tp3593736p3593736.html
Sent from
There is no risk of losing messages, as the send is still atomic operation.
So the producer will be notified that send succeeded only when all
destinations have the message.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
-
The experts in open source integration and
14 matches
Mail list logo
