> Is it possible to have a 3 node cluster with no failover? i.e
live-live-live?
Yes, it is.
Justin
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 10:37 PM, schalmers <
simon.chalm...@manufacturingintelligence.com.au> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Is it possible to have a 3 node cluster with no failover? i.e
> live-live-l
Hi Justin,
Is it possible to have a 3 node cluster with no failover? i.e
live-live-live?
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
I guess you'll have to weigh whether or not having an "idle spare backup"
is worth preventing fail-back for your application/use-case.
Justin
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:18 PM, jarek.przygodzki <
jarek.przygod...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for detailed explanation. The idea was to provide some
Thank you for detailed explanation. The idea was to provide some sort of idle
spare backup to still have live/backup pair even after master node failure.
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
Fail-back only works for a live/backup pair. It doesn't work for a
live/backup/backup triplet.
In your use-case there are 3 broker instances configured as live, backup,
backup. However, a backup server is owned by only one live server. This
means that when the 3 broker instances are started the
Hi,
I'm trying to setup 3-node Artemis (2.5.0) HA cluster (1 master and 2
slaves) with replication, automatic failover/failback and static connectors.
It works fine with just one slave, but with 2 slaves strange thing happens
- failback doesn't work, when original master comes back online both ser
