Is it safe to extend ActiveMQObjectMessage to work-around the default object serialization?

Hi AMQ experts, I posted a question last week, but haven't had any replies yet [ http://old.nabble.com/URGENT-QUESTION:-AMQ-5.3.0-bug-or-configuration-error--ObjectMessage-is--still--being-serialized-when-using-setObjectMessageSerializationDefered-and-setCopyMessageOnSend-td27654579.html

Re: Is it safe to extend ActiveMQObjectMessage to work-around the default object serialization?

Hi Bob, extending will be fine, but it should not be necessary. Can you open a jira issue to track this and attach a Junit test case. On 22 February 2010 15:04, bob.deremer bob.dere...@burningskysoftware.comwrote: Hi AMQ experts, I posted a question last week, but haven't had any replies yet