ted in the
> other providers in case Apollo didn't work out. ZeroMQ was one of the
> possibilities, though it seemed to lack some functionality that
> broker-based
> solutions provide, such as persistence.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.228
ext:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695935.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695916.html
> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> The creator of that provider has not s
On 04/29/2015 01:50 PM, rjrizzuto wrote:
> I thought I saw that there is a new ZeroMQ provider in 1.7.0. Does the same
> issue of not having an owner apply to it as well?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and
I thought I saw that there is a new ZeroMQ provider in 1.7.0. Does the same
issue of not having an owner apply to it as well?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695916.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list
rs no longer build?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695912.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Each provider along with the NMS API lib it
://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695912.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
aced into NuGet?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695876.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Folks are free to step up and work to make that happen, we love
co
.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695876.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695861.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
There aren't a lot of differences but you can view the issues that went
into
.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695861.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ened since 2013.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695824.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
I added new entries for the latest releases, site should upd
.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705p4695824.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
The latest is always what is on the ActiveMQ NMS site, right now that is
v1.7.0 and the v1.6.5 bugfix release
If you want t
not sure what versions are the latest stable ones, or why they are not
in NuGet. What is the recommendation for latest stable? Will it be
available in NuGet at some point?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/NMS-versioning-and-NuGet-tp4695705.html
Sent from
15 matches
Mail list logo
