gt;
> Sebastian
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Clebert Suconic
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2024 20:37
> An: users@activemq.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Performance issue with Artemis 2.28
>
> I’m having a DejaVoux on this. I guess at some point we missed a roun
Betreff: Re: Performance issue with Artemis 2.28
I’m having a DejaVoux on this. I guess at some point we missed a round trip
somewhere.
Some sync options at the serverlocator could have an effect.
It would be difficult to find the difference at this point.
Clebert Suconic
On Wed, May 29
> and no performance bottleneck with the same number of consumers.
> >
> > Maybe someone of the old HornetQ crew has an idea why this is different.
> I
> > know it’s a different product but many of the internals seem to be the
> same.
> >
> >
> >
> &
is different. I
> know it’s a different product but many of the internals seem to be the same.
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>
> From: s.go...@inform-technology.de
> Sent: Montag, 22. April 2024 08:45
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject:
it’s a different product but many of the internals seem to be the same.
Kind regards
Sebastian
From: s.go...@inform-technology.de
Sent: Montag, 22. April 2024 08:45
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Performance issue with Artemis 2.28
Good morning group.
We encounter
Good morning group.
We encounter a performance issue with ActiveMQ Artemis. The system was formerly
a JBoss HornetQ installation and was migrated to AciveMQ Artemis and with
HornetQ we had no issues at all
The performance issue is about a multicast address with a single queue that has
