It looks like the below configuration for Spring is actually working.
Is it indeed the expected way to do this properly?
Best regards,
Arjen
On 25-10-2018 19:46, Arjen van der Meijden wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I know this question has occasionally been asked before, but I can't
> seem to figure
Hi list,
I know this question has occasionally been asked before, but I can't
seem to figure out the correct method with the most recent ActiveMQ.
Our application runs with an in-memory database which is kept in sync by
listening to about 30 different topics on ActiveMQ which are monitored
via
