t;
> Manfred-von-Ardenne-Ring 6 | 01099 Dresden
> HRB 11256 Amtsgericht Dresden | USt.-ID DE 159 607 786
> Geschäftsführer: Manfred Austen, CEO und Dr. Ulf Martin, COO
>
> P Please check whether a printout of this e-mail is really necessary.
>
>
>
>
> Von:
Herbert, you might try the hub and one of the spoke broker.xml that I posted in
this topic.
You should then publish and subscribe on topics with a name that starts with
‘cms’, if you don’t want to change the address-policy:
Better then also remo
broker mesh?
for all addresses look like?
Best Regards
Herbert
Von:"Justin Bertram"
An: "users@activemq.apache.org"
Datum: 07.02.2024 15:19
Betreff: [Ext] Re: Is a federation of Hub-spoke broker topology
possible with Artemis?
The documentation does
BTW, as test producer and test consumer I used:
artemis consumer --destination="topic://cms.test"
artemis producer --destination="topic://cms.test"
I guess that attachments won’t work, so I include them as plain text.
BROKER A (a spoke)
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";
xsi:schemaLocation="urn:activemq
/schema/artemis-configuration.xsd">
The documentation does mention using a "hub and spoke" federation topology
[1]. However, as you noted, there's no example configuration. I wonder if
this may be down to the "max-hops" setting you're using.
Can you provide the broker.xml from your brokers attempting to use hub &
spoke?
Justin
[1
