Re: Severe performance hit upgrading to 5.2.0 from 5.1

2009-02-24 Thread hackingbear
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2136 > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1-tp22016698p22196537.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

AMQ Persistence vs Kaha: Re: Severe performance hit upgrading to 5.2.0 from 5.1

2009-02-21 Thread hackingbear
store, comparing to AMQ Persistence store. Thanks hackingbear wrote: > > Test case written, bug filed. > > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2136 > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1-tp22016698p

Re: Severe performance hit upgrading to 5.2.0 from 5.1

2009-02-21 Thread hackingbear
Test case written, bug filed. https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2136 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1-tp22016698p22141040.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Severe performance hit upgrading to 5.2.0 from 5.1

2009-02-18 Thread Justin Pitts
mplication of the UseDedicatedTaskRunner and prefetch, but > here they are identical for both versions. > > Why is there such a huge performance hit in 5.2? > > Thanks > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1-tp22016698p22077690.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Severe performance hit upgrading to 5.2.0 from 5.1

2009-02-17 Thread Gary Tully
is changed in the tests.) >> >> I know the implication of the UseDedicatedTaskRunner and prefetch, but >> here they are identical for both versions. >> >> Why is there such a huge performance hit in 5.2? >> >> Thanks >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1-tp22016698p22051194.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- http://blog.garytully.com Open Source SOA http://FUSESource.com

Re: Severe performance hit upgrading to 5.2.0 from 5.1

2009-02-16 Thread hackingbear
is changed in the tests.) > > I know the implication of the UseDedicatedTaskRunner and prefetch, but > here they are identical for both versions. > > Why is there such a huge performance hit in 5.2? > > Thanks > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabbl

Severe performance hit upgrading to 5.2.0 from 5.1

2009-02-14 Thread hackingbear
in the tests.) I know the implication of the UseDedicatedTaskRunner and prefetch, but here they are identical for both versions. Why is there such a huge performance hit in 5.2? Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1