> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2136
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1-tp22016698p22196537.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
store, comparing to AMQ Persistence store.
Thanks
hackingbear wrote:
>
> Test case written, bug filed.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2136
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1-tp22016698p
Test case written, bug filed.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2136
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1-tp22016698p22141040.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
mplication of the UseDedicatedTaskRunner and prefetch, but
> here they are identical for both versions.
>
> Why is there such a huge performance hit in 5.2?
>
> Thanks
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1-tp22016698p22077690.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
is changed in the tests.)
>>
>> I know the implication of the UseDedicatedTaskRunner and prefetch, but
>> here they are identical for both versions.
>>
>> Why is there such a huge performance hit in 5.2?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1-tp22016698p22051194.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
http://blog.garytully.com
Open Source SOA
http://FUSESource.com
is changed in the tests.)
>
> I know the implication of the UseDedicatedTaskRunner and prefetch, but
> here they are identical for both versions.
>
> Why is there such a huge performance hit in 5.2?
>
> Thanks
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabbl
in the tests.)
I know the implication of the UseDedicatedTaskRunner and prefetch, but here
they are identical for both versions.
Why is there such a huge performance hit in 5.2?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Severe-performance-hit-upgrading-to-5.2.0-from-5.1