Publishers can't enqueue messages locally without a broker. No broker, no
work done.
However, it's possible to embed a broker within the producer process, which
would then connect to the external broker when available and buffer
messages when the connection is broken. But this adds complexity to
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:44 AM, siddutta wrote:
> I wish to run an experiment in which the publisher loses connection with
> the
> broker and then enqueues them in its own queue and then when it regains
> connectivity it send s all its queued messages to the broker. How can I I
> do
> this since
exception). A trick that I can think of is to use a network of two brokers
and simulate the above by breaking the connection between the two brokers.
Is there an API call that I can use to do the above?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Simulating-loss-of
