Re: Slave Fail-over in a static cluster

Hey Justin, so if I have 3 master nodes and 3 slave nodes, should I have all the 5 nodes in each broker's static connectors, or only the masters + 1 slave (same group) would do? -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: Slave Fail-over in a static cluster

Awesome as usual! I'll give it a try and see how it works out! -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: Slave Fail-over in a static cluster

master1.xml master2.xml slave1.xml slave2.xml

Re: Slave Fail-over in a static cluster

Take a look at the documentation for replication [1], specifically the "Data Replication" section. It discusses the "group-name" configuration parameter which is what I believe you want. You'll find there's lots of helpful things in the documentation. :) Justin [1] https://activemq.apache.org/

Re: Slave Fail-over in a static cluster

It's a replication HA. On what basis does a master and slave pair together then? -- Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html

Re: Slave Fail-over in a static cluster

What kind of HA have you configured (i.e. replication or shared-store)? The cluster connection configuration doesn't define how masters and slaves pair together. Justin On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:30 PM artemisn00b wrote: > I have 3 master nodes and 3 slaves. I have 2 brokers in each of the 3 V

Slave Fail-over in a static cluster

I have 3 master nodes and 3 slaves. I have 2 brokers in each of the 3 VM instance, and one is a master and the other is a slave. Total 6 brokers. The current configuration is such that M1, M2, M3 - S1, S2, S3 i.e. Master1's slave is S2, which is in VM2. So, in case one VM goes down, the slave will