i just posted a scenario to the group, think it is related to 2 brokers being
"live"
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/2-broker-clusetr-both-brokers-are-live-td4730975.html;cid=1506091656365-514
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-User-f2341805.html
ow:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-failover-from-
> primary-to-backup-server-tp4719474p4719501.html
> To start a new topic under ActiveMQ - User, email
> ml-node+s2283324n2341805...@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from ActiveMQ - User, click here
> <http://activemq
Thanks for confirming this Andy, look forward to the new release/update.
Jason
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-failover-from-primary-to-backup-server-tp4719474p4719501.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
servers.
>
> I have tested this with 3 servers, and still the same result.
>
> Cheers
> Jason
>
> --
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-failo
'live', and then I unblock the port on the master
server, and now I have 2 'live' servers.
I have tested this with 3 servers, and still the same result.
Cheers
Jason
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-failover-from-primary-to-backup
rain
> scenario where both nodes in a 2-node cluster think they should be 'live'
> in
> a temporary network outage scenario.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Jason
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/Slow-failover-from-primary-to-backup-server-tp4719474.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
#x27; in
a temporary network outage scenario.
Thanks in advance,
Jason
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Slow-failover-from-primary-to-backup-server-tp4719474.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
