Christian, that's great news, thanks for sharing.
Since this feels like a post that people may be referring back to, there
are a couple things I think are worth adding.
If DLQ'ed messages are the only long-lived ones, I would expect a similar
result from using mKahaDB with one KahaDB for normal d
On 06/17/2016 06:16 AM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Just wanted to share some positive feedback we got from a customer.
I wrote some time go about a problem we had at a customer that
activemq failover took too long.
In the end the problem was the sheer amount of data in the kahadb
journals.
W
Just wanted to share some positive feedback we got from a customer.
I wrote some time go about a problem we had at a customer that activemq
failover took too long.
In the end the problem was the sheer amount of data in the kahadb journals.
We found that most of the long term queued data was in
