Yes, you need to bind the plugin to the goal/phase at hand with multiple <execution /> elements. Each execution contains its own configuration. Take a look at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7239786/how-to-invoke-the-same-maven-build-twice-in-one-call .
Hope that helps. Regards, *Raúl Kripalani* *Principal Consultant | FuseSource Corp. r...@fusesource.com | fusesource.com <http://www.fusesource.com/> skype: raul.fuse | twitter: @raulvk <http://twitter.com/raulvk>, @fusenews<http://twitter.com/fusenews> * blog: F3 - Flashes From the Field<http://blog.raulkr.net/?utm_source=fusesourceemail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=fusesourcemail> | aboutme: http://about.me/raulkripalani <http://twitter.com/fusenews> On 28 July 2012 23:22, cwash <chris.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry - if this is a stupid question here. > > Is it possible to start not just a single broker but 2+ brokers in a NOB > via > the http://activemq.apache.org/maven2-activemq-broker-plugin.htmlActiveMQ > Maven Plugin ? If not, is there anything technically stopping us from > doing > this? > > There are some failover scenarios I would like to automate via Maven > Integration tests if possible. We could use a stripped down version of our > larger configuration that accounts for more than a single master in the > NOB. > > In my mind, we would need to make sure the ports and common services don't > collide, and would potentially need to override the MQ home. > > If we can't do this I have to come up with a more elaborate test setup that > involves our CI server and dependent builds. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Start-multiple-brokers-using-maven-plugin-tp4654501.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
