Re: There is a possible split brain on nodeID XXXXX after upgrade to 2.30

2023-09-03 Thread Clebert Suconic
production clusters to 2.30. > > -- > Vilius > > -Original Message- > From: Justin Bertram > Sent: Friday, September 1, 2023 6:45 PM > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Subject: Re: There is a possible split brain on nodeID X after upgrade > to 2.30 > > How

RE: There is a possible split brain on nodeID XXXXX after upgrade to 2.30

2023-09-03 Thread Vilius Šumskas
unforeseen consequences before upgrading production clusters to 2.30. -- Vilius -Original Message- From: Justin Bertram Sent: Friday, September 1, 2023 6:45 PM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: There is a possible split brain on nodeID X after upgrade to 2.30 How

Re: There is a possible split brain on nodeID XXXXX after upgrade to 2.30

2023-09-01 Thread Justin Bertram
How is your cluster-connection configured? Are you using broadcast & discovery groups? If so, I've seen instances of this when stopping and starting the broker quickly. As far as I can tell the UDP multicast datagram somehow is delivered back to the broker that sent it originally. As long as your

There is a possible split brain on nodeID XXXXX after upgrade to 2.30

2023-09-01 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Hi, we have upgraded some of our environments from 2.28 to 2.30, others from 2.24 to 2.30 and all upgraded instances now show this strange log message during live node restart cycle: There is a possible split brain on nodeID 165c6eec-0429-11ed-a12a-42010a961402. Topology update ignored Full