Hi Jakub, did you get any information to share with us or do you require any
more information to help us out.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Two-ActiveMQ-brokers-in-same-cluster-are-behaving-as-Masters-tp4668301p4668542.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User
Thanks Jakub for quick response.
We configured two ActiveMQ brokers to same database (using JDBC persistence)
in production environment. We are trying to bring these two brokers one
after the other. The broker which was started first is behaving as Master
and the other is behaving as Slave. But,
Thanks Jakub for quick response.
We configured two ActiveMQ brokers to same database (using JDBC persistence)
in production environment. We are trying to bring these two brokers one
after the other. The broker which was started first is behaving as Master
and the other is behaving as Slave. But,
Can you give a bit more information about your cluster? How many ActiveMQ
instances are set up and how are they configured?
Thanks,
Jakub
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Two-ActiveMQ-brokers-in-same-cluster-are-behaving-as-Masters-tp4668301p4668303.html
We have configured two ActiveMQ brokers in same cluster so that the slave
attribute for one of the broker is false (Master) and for the other it is
true (Slave). But, at some point of time we observed that the slave
attribute for both these two brokers are set to false and because of the the
