ad thought if this is
indeed the case.
I'd appreciate any thoughts you have on this. Is there some way to reliably
use ActiveMQ via REST?
Thanks much.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activeMQ-topics-via-rest-missing-messages-tp4677698p4725045.html
).
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activeMQ-topics-via-rest-missing-messages-tp4677698p4677812.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activeMQ-topics-via-rest-missing-messages-tp4677698.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
below:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/activeMQ-topics-via-rest-missing-messages-tp4677698.html
To start a new topic under ActiveMQ - User, email
ml-node+s2283324n234180...@n4.nabble.com
To unsubscribe from ActiveMQ - User, visit
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp
When I read http://activemq.apache.org/rest.html;, I don't see anything saying
the REST/HTTP interface should not be used in production code. Please
elaborate, send me, or direct me to a list of your concerns. I understand that
Java clients would want to use the JMS API, but what is so wrong
