Re: stomp+nio+ssl

2010-12-05 Thread Mats Henrikson
On 3 December 2010 23:05, Aleksandar Ivanisevic aleksan...@ivanisevic.de wrote: Is it possible to have stomp+nio+ssl? Or it doesn't make sense since the SSL overhead will eat the gains from nio? NIO is also important because it decouples the number of threads from the number of connections

stomp+nio+ssl

2010-12-03 Thread Aleksandar Ivanisevic
Is it possible to have stomp+nio+ssl? Or it doesn't make sense since the SSL overhead will eat the gains from nio?

Re: stomp+nio+ssl ??

2010-01-26 Thread Dejan Bosanac
Hi, we have this on a list of features we want to implement. I just opened Jira issue to track it: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2583 For now, I'd suggest you use stomp+ssl Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/

stomp+nio+ssl ??

2010-01-25 Thread mastaskillz33
I'd like to run all 3 at once. How can I do this? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/stomp%2Bnio%2Bssltp27316245p27316245.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.