onnection
. Why ?
Any help is welcome .
thanks
--
James
---
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/why-can-not-
connect-to-the-brokers-tf4039601s2354.html#a11515312
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nab
; James
> ---
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/why-can-not-connect-to-the-brokers-tf4039601s2354.html#a11517383
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 7/10/07, Jiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
James:
Whether 'static' schema is not supported also? Last time I tried
'failover', but I find it was slow some way.(I configured 3 brokers , one
was my machine. I run the client code on my machine. I used
'failover:(tcp://localhost:61616,...)' i
>> > Any help is welcome .
>> >
>> > thanks
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> James
> ---
> http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/why-can-not-connect-to-the-brokers-tf4039601s2354.html#a11515312
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yeah - or use failover...
http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html
On 7/9/07, Adrian Co <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Must be out-dated documentation. I don't think list is a valid transport
scheme. You could try the static transport scheme.
Jiang wrote:
> I config 3 brokers .
Must be out-dated documentation. I don't think list is a valid transport
scheme. You could try the static transport scheme.
Jiang wrote:
I config 3 brokers . In the client code , I use uri as
"list:tcp://localhost:61616,tcp://192.168.1.110:61616,tcp://192.168.1.112:61616"
. But when I start the
nnection
. Why ?
Any help is welcome .
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/why-can-not-connect-to-the-brokers-tf4039601s2354.html#a11476576
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
