I think you are both right on the button. When you need to manipulate
a series of objects and you want those changes to be in a single
transaction, then a Manager is your friend. At one point I found
that I kept writing Manager methods that are just reflections of my
DAO methods. I foun
Hi Derek,
I remembered (and found) some more issues with Ubuntu 7.10. See the updated OS
Specific Issues page for the goods...
Nathan
- "Derek Broughton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nathan Anderson wrote:
>
> > Hi Derek,
> >
> > I don't remember the error message, but I had some issue
Hi Matt,
I will try it my self and post result with step-step intruction to the
list. Hope this could help simplify our dao layer.
Thanks.
Matt Raible wrote:
I've never heard of this framework until you pointed it out. You may
be able to add it's dao layer as a dependency (if it's a Maven
arti
I've never heard of this framework until you pointed it out. You may
be able to add it's dao layer as a dependency (if it's a Maven
artifact). I'm not sure, I haven't tried it myself.
Matt
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Le Anh Tuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I happene to know a ve
Hi Nathan,
Nathan Anderson wrote:
Derek - the fact that you have an object that has two "parents" is just another way of saying you have a many to many relationship. Every JE has exactly one Account and one Transaction, so it is the "join table" of your many to many relationship. As for the act
Hi all,
I happene to know a very useful framework named Parancoe
(http://www.parancoe.org/). By using parancoe, we can create dao very
easily by only writing interface and desired dao methods, not
implementation (see
http://www.parancoe.org/articles/2007/08/28/how-to-add-finder-methods-to-para
Hi Derek,
I just remembered the other problem I had. Make sure that all the files in the
tomcat directory are owned by the tomcat user (I think it is tomcat55 or
something like that). There is a problem where if the /var/lib/tomcat5.5/logs
isn't owned by the tomcat user then tomcat won't sta
Hi again,
Derek - the fact that you have an object that has two "parents" is just another
way of saying you have a many to many relationship. Every JE has exactly one
Account and one Transaction, so it is the "join table" of your many to many
relationship. As for the action only being able
Hi,
Derek Broughton wrote:
Nathan Anderson wrote:
Okay, if the DB transactional safety can be ignored in this example. The
only way that comes to mind to make this work is to have your JE objects
have an option Transaction property. Then after you create the
Transaction instance you would
Nathan Anderson wrote:
> Okay, if the DB transactional safety can be ignored in this example. The
> only way that comes to mind to make this work is to have your JE objects
> have an option Transaction property. Then after you create the
> Transaction instance you would set it on each of the JE'
Okay, if the DB transactional safety can be ignored in this example. The only
way that comes to mind to make this work is to have your JE objects have an
option Transaction property. Then after you create the Transaction instance
you would set it on each of the JE's.
Does that work for your
Nathan Anderson wrote:
> Hi Derek,
>
> I don't remember the error message, but I had some issues when I upgraded
> to Ubuntu 7.10. See the link for explanation of the problem and the
> solution that I used:
>
> http://appfuse.org/display/APF/OS+Specific+Issues
>
> If this is not your problem
Nathan Anderson wrote:
> Hi Derek,
>
> I don't remember the error message, but I had some issues when I upgraded
> to Ubuntu 7.10. See the link for explanation of the problem and the
> solution that I used:
>
> http://appfuse.org/display/APF/OS+Specific+Issues
>
> If this is not your problem
Nathan Anderson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I assume a "JE" is a Journal Entry and in modern accounting practices it
> is typical that a single "Transaction" has at least 2 JE's. What I'm not
> sure about is why the JE's are required to be created before the
> Transaction. This sounds like a case w
dusty wrote:
>
> Yeah Derek, we are not sure what a JE is, and transaction can mean a
> number
> of things. Can you post your model code and describe what you are trying
> to do in a little more detail?
>
"what" a JE or Transaction is is really irrelevant. They're just records.
If this was
Hi Derek,
I don't remember the error message, but I had some issues when I upgraded to
Ubuntu 7.10. See the link for explanation of the problem and the solution that
I used:
http://appfuse.org/display/APF/OS+Specific+Issues
If this is not your problem and you find a solution. That wiki pag
Sorry this isn't threaded, it's not on my server anymore.
Did anybody figure out the problem in
http://www.nabble.com/Re:-Appfuse-.war-in-tomcat-p15061918s2369.html
in which Tomcat refuses to load the appfuse project war file with nothing
more than a:
SEVERE: Error listenerStart
message? The us
dusty wrote:
>
> I think I get what you are saying. I don't think there is an easy way to
> do that in displayTag, but you could do the following instead:
>
> * Remove DisplayTags paging links and replace with your own.
> * Determine what years you want to display and then create a link for ea
Hello all,
I assume a "JE" is a Journal Entry and in modern accounting practices it is
typical that a single "Transaction" has at least 2 JE's. What I'm not sure
about is why the JE's are required to be created before the Transaction. This
sounds like a case where you want to use a database
Yeah Derek, we are not sure what a JE is, and transaction can mean a number
of things. Can you post your model code and describe what you are trying
to do in a little more detail?
Derek Broughton-2 wrote:
>
> I am s frustrated.
>
> I have an accounting app, where accounts have JEs, and
My guess is that you have entered the correct setter method in the
UserAction.java but at runtime the original org.appfuseUserAction code
is being run. This has has to do with how you have your project setup.
How are you getting UserAction.java into your projects source code? mvn
appfuse:fu
I think I get what you are saying. I don't think there is an easy way to do
that in displayTag, but you could do the following instead:
* Remove DisplayTags paging links and replace with your own.
* Determine what years you want to display and then create a link for each
year that will filter
Philip Barlow wrote:
> Ok, from experience, if i was displaying transactional data to a user,
> (I don't know if your data contains transactions) i would sort by most
> recent first, so page 1 is 2007, page 2 is 2006, most people seem fine
> with this. This is also how banks show your transactions
Ok, from experience, if i was displaying transactional data to a user,
(I don't know if your data contains transactions) i would sort by most
recent first, so page 1 is 2007, page 2 is 2006, most people seem fine
with this. This is also how banks show your transactions online and on
statements?
Philip Barlow wrote:
> Hi Derek,
>
> I think you may be over complicating this issue but i am not fully sure
> what you are trying to achieve. Is it not as simple as sorting your
> list, so the page you want to display first is page 1 of 7 and page 2 of
> 7, 3 of 7 etc. contains the relevant foll
Hi Folks,
I had troubles running my packed Appfuse-Application on my Tomcat-Server.
As it turned out, velocity was not able to create its logfile in the "current"
directory through the avalon logkit.
After an hour of painfull work, I found out, how I have to configure velocity
through its prope
26 matches
Mail list logo
