Hi,
> No need to fix something if it isn't broken
Maybe break me a little.
Haha, that's a joke :-)
a cup of Java, cheers!
Sha Jiang
mraible wrote:
>
> If you ignore the UserDao (and other existing) implementations, I
> think it will make more sense. We didn't re
n the sub-Dao really extends
GenericDao.
Additionally, in service layer, I found that RoleManagerImpl
invokes some of CRUD method in GenericDao directly.
Well, the value of GenericDao is shown :-D
a cup of Java, cheers!
Sha Jiang
mraible wrote:
>
> Have you completed the Persistence, H
Hi,
iBATIS is ORM framework, too.
I would do so much work if I implement the interface with pure JDBC.
a cup of Java, cheers!
Sha Jiang
mraible wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Sha Jiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> I'm using
post :-)
Thanks for any reply.
a cup of Java, cheers!
Sha Jiang
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is-GenericDao-interface-general--tp18081891s2369p18081891.html
Sent from the AppFuse - User mailing list archive at Nabbl
Hi all,
I'm using AppFuse 2.0.1.
I used command "mvn appfuse:full-source", then I got an Appfuse example.
I have some puzzle on DAO layer: How to use GenericDao/GenericDaoHibernate?
Let's focus on domain User and its DAO.
GenericDaoHibernate extends HibernateDaoSupport and implements GenericDao;
Thanks for the info.
a cup of Java, cheers!
Sha Jiang
2007/7/8, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
http://issues.appfuse.org/browse/APF-186
On 7/2/07, jiangshachina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I just be curious with the matter,
> anybody can give me some