Re: [appfuse-user] BaseDaoTestCase substitution

2007-04-20 Thread paulie
I see where you are coming from. Especially since BaseDaoTestCase is extending AbstractTransactionalDataSourceSpringContextTests. Sounds like it is more Spring's issue than yours. Seems like they could have come up with a more generic term than 'Test' for this functionality. As for AppFuse, ma

Re: [appfuse-user] BaseDaoTestCase substitution

2007-04-19 Thread Matt Raible
You're saying its wierd that we have BaseDaoTestCase in the appfuse-hibernate.jar? It is kinda wierd, but the other option was for us to create an entirely new appfuse-test module with all the base classes. If enough folks think this is a better approach, we can try to make it happen after 2.0.

Re: [appfuse-user] BaseDaoTestCase substitution

2007-04-19 Thread paulie
It just felt weird having something refered to as 'TestCase' promoted to production. I wanted to make sure that this was the right approach. mraible wrote: > > On 4/18/07, paulie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I have gone through the Hibernate tutorials and built an app extending >> BaseDaoT

Re: [appfuse-user] BaseDaoTestCase substitution

2007-04-19 Thread Matt Raible
On 4/18/07, paulie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have gone through the Hibernate tutorials and built an app extending BaseDaoTestCase. Everything is working great. I wanted to see if I should deploy my code extending BaseDaoTestCase, build my own DAO base class, or extend another DAO base class

[appfuse-user] BaseDaoTestCase substitution

2007-04-18 Thread paulie
I have gone through the Hibernate tutorials and built an app extending BaseDaoTestCase. Everything is working great. I wanted to see if I should deploy my code extending BaseDaoTestCase, build my own DAO base class, or extend another DAO base class. Let me know if there is somewhere I can find