It's a formula field (e.g.):
/**
* @hibernate.property
* formula="QUESTION_NUM"
*/
whose value is set as a result of being a child of a List association:
* @hibernate.list-index
* column="QUESTION_NUM"
* base="1"
The @hibernate.property tag does have an "access" parameter
I would give yourself the setter. I believe Hibernate expects them to
be there out of the box. Plus, how else do you plan on modifying your
instance variables without one?
Matt Raible wrote:
I don't know - I've never tried to use XDoclet with field-level
access. AFAIK, it's not possible to u
I don't know - I've never tried to use XDoclet with field-level
access. AFAIK, it's not possible to use XDoclet and annotate fields,
but I could be wrong.
Matt
On 12/20/06, GaryW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When using "field" level access, do you put the @hibernate.property tag on
the field or
When using "field" level access, do you put the @hibernate.property tag on
the field or on the getter? Also, do you need a setter in this case or is
that optional since it's setting the field and not the property?
Thanks,
Gary
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Hibernate-XD
