Hello,
Managed to get the whole thing workingI can use DOJO/Scriptaculous/Spry/
but with a common custom-tag library...
Very Neat but very cumbersome to setup and slow too for now
Advice: Please use JMaki only if you have Netbeans as your primary
IDEalso extensions can be anything but .
My experience with JMaki has been bad. I've also built a fairly large app
with Dojo and would not use it again because despite all the optimization
build / development techniques suggested, certain files are requested
synchronously that causes browser freezes. Also too many gremlins that cause
a D
sure...I am already getting a slight headache :)
mraible wrote:
>
> I don't see a problem with it - let us know how it turns out! We may
> make you write a tutorial if it works. ;-)
>
> Matt
>
> On 3/15/07, VJ22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Do you think it would be a
I don't see a problem with it - let us know how it turns out! We may
make you write a tutorial if it works. ;-)
Matt
On 3/15/07, VJ22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Do you think it would be a good choice to use JMaki as the wrapper class for
any AJAX widget in an Appfuse architectur
Hi everyone,
Do you think it would be a good choice to use JMaki as the wrapper class for
any AJAX widget in an Appfuse architecture
I am thinking of integrating it within Appfuse.any thoughts on this ?
Reason being I do not want to have too many UI widgets cluttered across the
app
Desi
