Thanks everybody,
I would use the "full source" archtype, to since I only want to have
apfuse as a starter pack where I adjust all the parts over time and I
would be willing to compromise on upgrade functionality as a trade off
to "full" control.
So I will stick with the 1.x release than.
Than
, 2007 9:00:33 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles
Subject: [appfuse-user] Problems with package structure
Hi all,
I got a couple of difficulties with Appfuse 2.0M4, which might happen
since I am only familiar with the 1.x branch of Appfuse so far and do
not have much maven expertise.
With the older r
al Message -
From: "Karsten Voges" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@appfuse.dev.java.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2007 9:00:33 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles
Subject: [appfuse-user] Problems with package structure
Hi all,
I got a couple of difficulties with Appfuse 2.0M4, which might
ROTECTED]>
To: users@appfuse.dev.java.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2007 9:00:33 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles
Subject: [appfuse-user] Problems with package structure
Hi all,
I got a couple of difficulties with Appfuse 2.0M4, which might happen
since I am only familiar with the 1.x branch o
Hi all,
I got a couple of difficulties with Appfuse 2.0M4, which might happen
since I am only familiar with the 1.x branch of Appfuse so far and do
not have much maven expertise.
With the older release all the Appfuse Src-Files where transformed to
the customized package structure (e.g. from o
