o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 July 2007 09:11
To: users@appfuse.dev.java.net
Subject: [appfuse-user] RE: RE: many-to-many with attribute ... again
'morning gents,
Ok, no worries, I'll use an auto-gen'd id.
Everything seems to be working a-ok. Mind you, I haven't really 'sunk my
'morning gents,
Ok, no worries, I'll use an auto-gen'd id.
Everything seems to be working a-ok. Mind you, I haven't really 'sunk my
teeth' into the app yet, I just wanted to confirm that what I wanted to do
was a) possible and b) not a headache. Now that I see that it's feasible,
it's onwards a
syg6 wrote:
>
> I figured it out. My fault. Forgot to put @Entity in the Person class!
>
> One last question - I think PersonRequest should have a combination of
> 'person_id' and 'request_id' as its primary key, how can I do that?
> Currently it has its own auto-numeric key but I think it's mor
So all you need in the PersonRequest model is the getters and setters.
Cheers
Aled
-Original Message-
From: syg6 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 09 July 2007 15:21
To: users@appfuse.dev.java.net
Subject: [appfuse-user] RE: RE: many-to-many with attribute ... again
I figured it out. My f
I figured it out. My fault. Forgot to put @Entity in the Person class!
One last question - I think PersonRequest should have a combination of
'person_id' and 'request_id' as its primary key, how can I do that?
Currently it has its own auto-numeric key but I think it's more correct to
use a compos
Yup. I have all 3 classes in my hibernate.cfg.xml:
I also tried deleting PersonRequest from the hibernate.cfg.xml because I
wasn't sure if it needed to be defined or not. But I got a different error
so, I guess it does.
I'll keep trying ...
Thanks!
Bob
Aled Rhys Jones wrote:
>
> Yeah, y
