Re: Uploading POM

2009-01-19 Thread Marc Canaleta
This is how I think it works, and the common practice in my opinion: - Every time you deploy an snapshot version, a version with SNAPSHOT replaced by the timestamp is created. - This snapshot is never replaced. - Archiva can purge snapshots based on age or number of snapshots. - You declare depende

Re: Uploading POM

2009-01-19 Thread emerson cargnin
I thought that for snapshots the behaviour was different... Will the client still find the latest snapshot or only the 1.0-SNAPSHOT ? What is the common practice on this? To modify the pom? 2009/1/19 Martin Höller : > Hi! > > On 19 Jan 2009, emerson cargnin wrote: >> I'm having some problems when

Re: Uploading POM

2009-01-19 Thread Martin Höller
Hi! On 19 Jan 2009, emerson cargnin wrote: > I'm having some problems when uploading a POM. When I try to upload a > second time a snapshot, it will create a timestamp based one like: > * 1.0-20090119.095642-1/ > * 1.0-20090119.100853-1/ > * 1.0-SNAPSHOT/ > > These was after the thir

Uploading POM

2009-01-19 Thread emerson cargnin
Hi I'm having some problems when uploading a POM. When I try to upload a second time a snapshot, it will create a timestamp based one like: * 1.0-20090119.095642-1/ * 1.0-20090119.100853-1/ * 1.0-SNAPSHOT/ These was after the third time uploading the pom.xml. I tried to remove phisic