Does anybody have a good Work-around?
willem.jiang wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> It's a known issue[1], and we fixed it in SMX4 branch.
> If you are not comfortable with playing apache SNAPSHOT version, you can
> try out the coming up Fuse ESB 4.1.x monthly release version.
>
> [1] http://fusesource.com
i updated jira issue.
thanks a lot.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Carlo Camerino wrote:
> hi,
>
> thanks for all the reply.
> I will be doing a little research on this.
> Especially the ones you gave me.
>
> thanks a lot
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Christian
> Schneider wrote:
>> Hi C
hi,
thanks for all the reply.
I will be doing a little research on this.
Especially the ones you gave me.
thanks a lot
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Christian
Schneider wrote:
> Hi Carlo,
>
> if you want round robin and failover you could think about using a simple
> jms queue. If both your h
Hi Carlo,
if you want round robin and failover you could think about using a
simple jms queue. If both your hosts listen on the queue then a jms
server like ActiveMQ will do round robin for all active listeners and
automatically leave out those that are not alive. Camel has very nice
support
Hi
And maybe 1 month ago there was some similar questions regarding load
balancer in Camel 1.x.
You can use nabble to search the camel user forum to find this topic.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:22 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Carlo Camerino wrote:
>> It seems that wha
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Carlo Camerino wrote:
> It seems that what I was looking for is present in Camel 2.0 which is
> the failover feature. I have a question though,
> Can I support failover and at the same time make it round robin? If
> one node is not functioning then I will no longer
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Willem Jiang wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Claus created a same requirement[1] as yours, but I like your scanner
> with exclude and include option more :)
Yeah Stephens works is really cool.
Now that we are into changing the DSL for route builder I have thought
of intro
You found the answer yourself.
For the failover support of the round robin, maybe we can add a flag in
the processor to tell if we need to skip that loadbalancer node when the
node is not functioning.
But according your requirement, you may need to use the failover feature :)
Willem
Carlo Cameri
Hi Stephen,
Claus created a same requirement[1] as yours, but I like your scanner
with exclude and include option more :)
Thanks for your contribution.
[1]https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1695
Willem
sgargan wrote:
> Claus,
>
> I've made a patch to allow the Ant like inclusion
Claus,
I've made a patch to allow the Ant like inclusion and exclusion you
suggested. I've opened an improvement Jira ticket for it with a patch
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1708.
Please shout if there is anything you'd like changed with it.
thx
ste
sgargan wrote:
>
> Ch
It seems that what I was looking for is present in Camel 2.0 which is
the failover feature. I have a question though,
Can I support failover and at the same time make it round robin? If
one node is not functioning then I will no longer use that node.
Thanks
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Carlo
Hi There,
I have a situation in which I need to connect to two different hosts. I need
to be able to switch at runtime to a different host when one host goes down.
What enterprise integration pattern should I use here? I don't know if I
should use Dynamic Routing Or Load Balancing for this one.
Th
12 matches
Mail list logo
