Hi Kevin,
I fixed the issue which is based on your patch, please feel free to
check out the change[1]
[1]http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=922763&view=rev
Willem
Kevin Jackson wrote:
Hi,
Good ideas. Feel free to create a JIRA ticket.
And a patch is also welcome. We love contributions.
http
Current camel context doesn't provides a way to set the system properties.
You can set the system properties by using -D option when you start the
JVM, and if you are using ServiceMix, you can change the file in
${SERVICEMIX_HOME}/system.properties.
Willem
lekkie wrote:
Thanks.
Is there a
Hi,
You can consider to use camelTarget or camelSource to send or receive
the camel message in Spring Integration.
You can find the examples here [1]
[1] http://camel.apache.org/springintegration.html
Willem
Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:56 PM, clandestino_bgd
wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
> Good ideas. Feel free to create a JIRA ticket.
> And a patch is also welcome. We love contributions.
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2547
Includes skeleton patch/tests for this functionality.
Thanks,
Kev
Thanks.
Is there a way one can set system properties (e.g. http.proxyHost) from a
camel context?
willem.jiang wrote:
>
> Just saw from the Fuse forums, you are using the cxf:cxfEndpoint.
>
> Yeah, this should work for you, as cxf use the sun's HTTP URI
> implementation to connect the back e
Hi
Good ideas. Feel free to create a JIRA ticket.
And a patch is also welcome. We love contributions.
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Kevin Jackson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a follow up to conclude how I tested consuming mail
> attachments in camel 2.1 + spring. Posting here because others o
Hi,
This is a follow up to conclude how I tested consuming mail
attachments in camel 2.1 + spring. Posting here because others on the
user list may find this useful going forward.
With camel 2.1 it doesn't seem to be possible to completely decouple
the processing of email messages with attachmen
You can just use your own JPA code to persist the message instead of
the out of the box feature.
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Jim Talbut wrote:
> On 13/03/2010 07:36, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Jim Talbut
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Willem,
>>>
>>> Ah.
>>> I still h
On 13/03/2010 07:36, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Jim Talbut wrote:
Willem,
Ah.
I still have no idea how the TypeConverter is being called, but it's working
great :).
I can make my SOAP:Fault converter into an interceptor, which has the
benefit of making the routes
