Cool - thanks a lot. Yes, seems like preMove is a bit special indeed - it
addresses technical issue of concurrency as opposed to functional
requirements of file placement after processing...
Pavel
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> I created a ticket to track this
> https://i
BTW
I have created a ticket to see if we can do something in Camel to make
it react to those security exceptions
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-3017
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Holger wrote:
>
> I forwarded my question to activemq-user:
> http://old.nabble.com/SecurityExce
Hi
You can see the unit tests in camel-mail. We use a MailMock framework.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Tristan Koen wrote:
> Thanks Claus.
> Works perfectly in 2.5-SNAPSHOT.
>
> As an aside, how would one go about simulating an email received by
> the camel-mail imap component in a unit test
Thanks Claus.
Works perfectly in 2.5-SNAPSHOT.
As an aside, how would one go about simulating an email received by
the camel-mail imap component in a unit test? I tried the following,
but I never got the same results as the real-world test:
public class MailTest extends CamelTestSupport {
@Overri
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Sean Parsons wrote:
> I'm just experimenting with camel-xmpp, but it seems a bit like it doesn't
> support request reply like most of the other endpoints. The use case that
> this is causing me some grief with writing a bot using the endpoint, so that
> the user s
thanks Claus.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Auto-Start-up-issue-when-adding-RouteDefintions-tp2256671p2259483.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I forwarded my question to activemq-user:
http://old.nabble.com/SecurityException-not-delegated-to-Camel--tp29305408p29305408.html
Thanks,
Holger
Claus Ibsen-2 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Holger wrote:
>>
>> Hi Claus,
>>
>> Thanks for your answer.
>>
>> Yet, I know how to conf
Hi,
I've overcome this problem now though and stepped into a myriad of new ones
:)
At the moment I can't make FTPSClient/Camel connect to a server that works
perfectly fine with any other client with FTPS enabled (server
authentication only). Any idea if FTPSClient is using SSLv2 or v3? Can't
fi
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Holger wrote:
>
> Hi Claus,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> Yet, I know how to configure Active MQ and really intended to have no access
> to the queue bar2 as a test case.
>
> I assumed that Camel would rollback the transaction in this case but
> unfortunately it
Hi Claus,
Thanks for your answer.
Yet, I know how to configure Active MQ and really intended to have no access
to the queue bar2 as a test case.
I assumed that Camel would rollback the transaction in this case but
unfortunately it does not:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Holger wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Tristan wrote:
>
> Thanks.
> Somehow I ignored the blue bit. Have now subscribed.
>
I have created a ticket to track this bug
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-3015
And commiting a fix in short time. You are welcome to try 2.5-SNAPSHOT
As a workar
Thanks.
Somehow I ignored the blue bit. Have now subscribed.
On 30 July 2010 11:16, davsclaus [via Camel]
wrote:
> Hi
>
> See this wiki page
> http://camel.apache.org/discussion-forums.html
>
> You need to be a subscriber of the mailinglist to have mails forwarded.
>
> _
Hi
See this wiki page
http://camel.apache.org/discussion-forums.html
You need to be a subscriber of the mailinglist to have mails forwarded.
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Mail-component-velocity-and-NullpointerException-tp2256742p2259340.html
Sent from the
Look at AMQ about security.
You most likely need to configure the activemq component with a valid
username/password which has permission to send messages.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Holger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have the following (very basic) route, which should be transactional
> (i.e.,
Hi
There was another Camel end user, Bengt who helped with getting the
FTPS stuff into Camel 2.4.
He may be on vacation or something, but try to get his attention.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Andreas Asmuss
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to connect to a FileZilla server with FTPS (Camel 2.4
Hi,
Can you try out the latest Camel 2.5-SNAPSHOT to verify the fix?
Please let me know if it works.
Willem
--
Apache Camel, Apache CXF committer
Open Source Integration http://www.fusesource.com
Blog http://willemjiang.blogspot.com
Tiwtter http://twitter.com/will
Hi
Since you extend existing Camel code, then some logic of Camels is
still being in use.
Camel uses a naming pattern to apply thread names.
You can set a thread name which implies WebSphere for example
See the setThreadNamePattern method
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:18 AM, chaillon wrote:
>
>
Yes, it should be the good manner to do it...
I have tried this option with no success
My source code is linked to this message
I extends the DefaultExecutorStrategy and reference it via Spring XML.
I have replaced all the calls to ExecutorServiceHelper from the
DefaultExecutorStrategy by calls
Yeah you need to set the brokerURL on the activemq component.
For example in the spring XML file.
The @Produce only refers to the activemq component and the name of the
JMS destination to send the message to.
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 9:28 AM, benxs wrote:
>
>> You change the brokerURL
>
> How do
Hello
Sorry for the late reply, thank you for the JIRA issue
Cheers
S. Ali Tokmen
savas-ali.tok...@bull.net
Office: +33 4 76 29 76 19
GSM:+33 66 43 00 555
Bull, Architect of an Open World TM
http://www.bull.com
On 27/07/2010 06:43, Willem Jiang wrote:
I just checked the code, the CxfSpr
> You change the brokerURL
How do I do this in java POJOs with annotations?
I think in pure java coding would be:
import org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory;
...
CamelContext context = new DefaultCamelContext();
ConnectionFactory connectionFactory = new
ActiveMQConnectionFactory(
21 matches
Mail list logo
